Showing posts with label Babylon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Babylon. Show all posts

Monday, August 12, 2024

Are Archaeologist Now Agreeing that the Ancient Adena Mound Builders of the Ohio Valley were Using a Base 60 Babylonian Numbering System?

 Are Archaeologist Now Agreeing that the Ancient Adena Mound Builders of the Ohio Valley were Using a Base 60 Babylonian Numbering System

The earthworks' solstice alignments at Winchester, Indiana, align to make two Pythagorean triangles. Woke archaeologists claim that Native Americans knew these mathematical and geometric principles. I believe the "Hopewell" mound builders were of Dakota Sioux origin. The earlier "Adena" were the Babylonian Amorites. Indian legends say that a white race once inhabited the Ohio Valley and "were skilled in the arts."  The Amorites were called "giants" in the Bible. Plenty of recorded giants are found in Adena mounds. The Amorites are proposed to have built Stonehenge and the conical burial mounds surrounded by a ditch in England. There are Adena mounds in the Ohio Valley surrounded by a ditch. Henges are found throughout the Ohio Valley. Two of the henges in the Ohio Valley are aligned to the May 1 sunrise. Beltane May 1 has its origins with the Canaanite/Amorites!  

Delsy Wilson who is one of the docents at the Serpent Mound made an interesting statement. "Isn’t there a proposed Hopewell base measurement also based on 60?" Yes, it is me who advocates that Babylonia Amorites were in the Ohio Valley." We have two confirmed earthwork sites that used the Pythagorean theorem. The two most frequent measures of sun temples (henges) are 660 and 666 feet with one 555 feet in circumfernce. Many of the square earthworks were 1080 feet per side. Both of these number are Babylonian Gematria numbers. They are also both divisible by 60. We also know that earthworks were constructed by a people that understood trigonometry, pi and sqauring circles. The Babylonian Amorotes (the accounted giants in the Bible) were in the Ohio Valley.

An Australian mathematician cracked the code of a famous 3,700 year old Babylonian clay tablet revealing that they were doing more accurate trigonometry nearly 1,500 years before the Greeks.

In 2017, Australian mathematician Dr. Daniel Mansfield from the University of New South Wales decoded a 3,700-year-old Babylonian clay tablet known as Plimpton 322. The tablet, which was originally discovered in the early 20th century in southern Iraq, contains a series of numbers arranged in four columns and 15 rows. For a long time, the purpose of these numbers remained a mystery.

Dr. Mansfield and his team discovered that Plimpton 322 is a trigonometric table. Unlike Greek trigonometry, which is based on angles and circles, Babylonian trigonometry used ratios of sides of right-angled triangles and a base 60 (sexagesimal) number system. This system, the researchers found, enabled the Babylonians to create a trigonometric table that is more accurate than the Greek method, as it avoids irrational numbers and provides exact ratios.

Key points about this discovery include:

1. Plimpton 322 predates Greek mathematicians such as Hipparchus, who is often credited with founding trigonometry, by more than a millennium.

2. The Babylonians' use of a base 60 number system allowed them to make complex calculations with great precision. Their method is particularly advantageous for some practical applications, such as surveying and architecture.

3. The tablet shows that the Babylonians had a sophisticated understanding of right-angled triangles and could solve problems related to their sides with exceptional accuracy.

4. This finding suggests that the history of mathematics is richer and more complex than previously thought, with advanced mathematical practices emerging in different cultures independently.

The discovery of the true purpose of Plimpton 322 has reshaped our understanding of ancient mathematical knowledge and highlights the advanced capabilities of Babylonian scholars long before similar concepts were documented in Greek mathematics.




Wednesday, October 18, 2023

Babylonia Gematria Numerology: 666 and 555 Feet Measured at the Giant's Sun Temples at Mounds State Park

 

Babylonia Gematria Numerology: 666 and 555 Feet Measured at the Giant's Sun Temples at Mounds State Park



666 represents the Sun Father while 555 represents the Holy Union of Opposites or the Sacred Marriage555.5 X pi = 1740 which is the sun total of 666 and 1080.  1080 was the number of the Lunar or Earth Mother. A scientist from MIT wrote that the ancient Babylonian Amorites (the accounted giants in the Bible) were using an identical measure as our modern foot.


The Circle is symbolic of the Male Sun while 1080 represented the female Lunar or Earth Mother. In ancient geometry the square represented the female. All five of these square earthworks in Chillicothe have a length of 1080 per side. Do you really think this is serendipity?  Babylonian numerology occurs in many of the measures in the Ohio earthworks. This is the numbers of 660, 666, and 1080 that occurr at the Piketon Works, in Ohio www.nephilimgiants.net : Babylonian Numerology at the Piketon, Ohio Sacred Via



Monday, August 21, 2023

Babylonian Numerology at the Piketon, Ohio Sacred Via

 

Babylonian Numerology at the Piketon, Ohio Sacred Via



The Piketon Sacred Via was constructed using the numerological codex of Gematria as was many other earthworks in Ohio. The length of the via was 1080 feet, a number that is replicated in many of the square earthworks around Chillicothe, Ohio.  The width was 215 feet is found in an sun temple at New Castle, Indiana and a vesica pisca shaped work at Mounds State Park in Anderson, Indiana.   For more photos of the Piketon, Ohio burial mounds www.nephilimgiants.net : Rare Photo of the Piketon, Ohio Sacred Via


The numerology codex of Gematria used at the Piketon Sacred Via is consistent with other earthworks in the Ohio Valley that used numbers 666, 660 and 1080 to represent the Sun and Earth Mother gods.

  The general terrain is still evident at the via that terminated at the drop off to the north and west, called Switzers Point..  Was this symbolic of the transition from a Upper to Lower world?


1910 photo looking north towards the sacred via that can still be seen on left.


Adena burial mounds located at the southern terminus of the sacred via.



Saturday, January 14, 2023

Babylonian Giant Amorites of the Ohio Valley Gematria Numerology and Sacred Geometry Primer. 666 and 1080

 

 Babylonian Giant Amorites of the Ohio Valley Gematria Numerology and Sacred Geometry Primer.  666 and 1080


    The two basic numbers that are the core of the numerology codex of Gematria are 666 and 1080.  666 was symbolic of the male Sun and 1080 represented the Earth Mother. The era of the Amorite kingdoms, ca. 2000–1595 BC, is sometimes known as the "Amorite period" in Mesopotamian history. The Amorites were the accounted giants in the Bible. 
    Geometrically the Sun was represented by the circle and the Earth Mother by the square.  See how Gematria is evident at the Washington Monument www.nephilimgiants.net : Nephilim Gematria Numerology and the Washington Monument 555 and 666

The circle and square at Circleville, Ohio are combined in several earthworks in Ohio Valley that represent the equal balance of these two forces of nature.  The Amorites developed advanced mathematics of pi and square roots of numbers along with circling a square,where the circle and square both have equal areas.

The circled square is the geometric equivalent of the Yin Yang symbol

Neurologically, the Ohio giants used the ancient base 12 measure of our modern foot. Earthworks with solar alignments, called henges were either 666 feet or 660 feet in circumference.

Square earthworks that symbolized the Earth Mother were typically 1080 feet per side.

At several sites both the Sun and Earth Mother numbers were used together.  At Winchester, Indiana where the gateways were aligned to both the Summer and Winter Solstices, the east west walls were 660 feet and the north south walls were 1080. Interesting is that 1080 X 2 = 2160.  216 is an important number because it is the sum total of 6 X 6 X 6.

At the Piketon, Ohio Sacred via we also find both of these numbers used in the construction of these works.  The walls of the Sacred Via were 1080 feet in length.

These earthen wall extended from the sacred via. 420 + 240 = 660.  420 + 420 + 240 = 1080. 212 X pi = 666!

210 X pi = 660.  You can see how these numbers were used consistently in the construction of the Ohio earthworks in accordance with the Gematria numerical Codex.



Tuesday, February 23, 2016

2016 The Year of the Ohio Valley Nephilim


2016 The Year of the Ohio Valley Nephilim



    Ancient Babylonian numerical codex of Gematria found within the measurments of the Ohio Valley mounds and earthworks.















Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Amorite Mathematics and the Isosceles Triangle Formed at Newark, Ohio Earthworks


Amorite Mathematics and the Isosceles Triangle Formed at Newark, Ohio Earthworks.



   The number 3 was an important number to the Ohio Amorites, and was expressed geometrically as an isosceles triangle. This knowledge was brought to Ohio from Babylonian during the Amorite occupation.They had formulated the mathematical rules of generating Pythagorean triples and understood the relationship between the sides of a right triangle,  12 + 12 = ()2.]








This Adena mound group located Ross County,Ohio was diagrammed by the Ohio Historical Society.







From the center of the Octagon to the center of Henge and then to the burial mounds located on Geller Hill an isosceles triangle is formed.















Friday, February 17, 2012

Babylonian Weapons Technology in the Great Lakes



Babylonian Weapons Technology in the Great Lakes












   Babylonian -Amorite Weapons technology in Wisconsin and Minnesota is the result of the search for copper and tin for the emerging Bronze Age. The Amorites, who were the accounted giants in the Bible had seized Babylon in 1950 B.C..  The Amorite  weapons technology and giant human skeletal remains have left a trail  of evidence from the Biblical Levant to The British Isles where they mined tin, to the northern shores of Lake Superior where they mined copper.  The mystery of the Copper Culture in the Great Lakes region is solved by comparing their weapons with those being manufactured by the Babylonians for the Hittiite, Egyptian and Hebrew armies.

   These ancient Babylonian weapons can be closely affiliated with the giant human skeletons that are found in the greatest numbers in the Levant, the British Isles and the Ohio Valley.

Sunday, July 31, 2011

History of the Babylonian Amorites: Builders of the Geometric Earthworks in the Ohio Valley

History of the Babylonian Amorites: Builders of the Geometric Earthworks in the Ohio Valley



The Amorites controlled Babylon from 2000 B.C. - 1600 B.C. They fled the Levant for their mining operations in England and North America where they were mining copper during their reign in Babylon. Here is a Chippewa Indian legend that describes them. www.nephilimgiants.net : Chippewa Indians Legend of a White Race of Copper Miners

    Sun worship came into prominence in its most fully developed form during the obscure period which followed the decline of the Dynasty of Isin. This was probably due to the changed political conditions which brought about the ascendancy for a time of Larsa, the seat of the Sumerian sun cult, and of Sippar, the seat of the Akkadian sun cult. Larsa was selected as the capital of the Elamite conquerors, while their rivals, the Amorites, appear to have first established their power at Sippar.
Babbar, the sun god of Sippar, whose Semitic name was Shamash, must have been credited with the early successes of the Amorites, who became domiciled under his care, and it was possibly on that account that the ruling family subsequently devoted so much attention to his worship in Merodach's city of Babylon, where a sun temple was erected, and Shamash received devout recognition as an abstract deity of righteousness and law, who reflected the ideals of well organized and firmly governed communities.
      The first Amoritic king was Sumu-abum, but little is known regarding him except that he reigned at Sippar. He was succeeded by Sumu-la-ilu, a deified monarch, who moved from Sippar to Babylon, the great wall of which he either repaired or entirely reconstructed in his fifth year. With these two monarchs began the brilliant Hammurabi, or First Dynasty of Babylonia, which endured for three centuries. Except Sumu-abum, who seems to stand alone, all its kings belonged to the same family, and son succeeded father in unbroken succession.
     Sumu-la-ilu was evidently a great general and conqueror of the type of Thothmes III of Egypt. His empire, it is believed, included the rising city states of Assyria, and extended southward as far as ancient Lagash.
        Of special interest on religious as well as political grounds was his association with Kish. That city had become the stronghold of a rival family of Amorite kings, some of whom were powerful enough to assert their independence. They formed the Third Dynasty of Kish. The local god was Zamama, the Tammuz-like deity, who, like Nin-Girsu of Lagash, was subsequently identified with Merodach of Babylon. But prominence was also given to the moon god Nannar, to whom a temple had been erected, a fact which suggests that sun worship was not more pronounced among the Semites than the Arabians, and may not, indeed, have been of Semitic origin at all. Perhaps the lunar temple was a relic of the influential Dynasty of Ur.
     Sumu-la-ilu attacked and captured Kish, but did not slay Bunutakhtunila, its king, who became his vassal. Under the overlordship of Sumu-la-ilu, the next ruler of Kish, whose name was Immerum, gave prominence to the public worship of Shamash. Politics and religion went evidently hand in hand.
    Sumu-la-ilu strengthened the defences of Sippar, restored the wall and temple of Cuthah, and promoted the worship of Merodach and his consort Zerpanitum at Babylon. He was undoubtedly one of the forceful personalities of his dynasty. His son, Zabium, had a short but successful reign, and appears to have continued the policy of his father in consolidating the power of Babylon and securing the allegiance of subject cities. He enlarged Merodach's temple, E-sagila, restored the Kish temple of Zamama, and placed a golden image of himself in the temple of the sun god at Sippar. Apil-Sin, his son, surrounded Babylon with a new wall, erected a temple to Ishtar, and presented a throne of gold and silver to Shamash in that city, while he also strengthened Borsippa, renewed Nergal's temple at Cuthah, and dug canals.
     The next monarch was Sin-muballit, son of Apil-Sin and father of Hammurabi. He engaged himself in extending and strengthening the area controlled by Babylon by building city fortifications and improving the irrigation system. It is recorded that he honoured Shamash with the gift of a shrine and a golden altar adorned with jewels. Like Sumu-la-ilu, he was a great battle lord, and was specially concerned in challenging the supremacy of Elam in Sumeria and in the western land of the Amorites.
   For a brief period a great conqueror, named Rim-Anum, had established an empire which extended from Kish to Larsa, but little is known regarding him. Then several kings flourished at Larsa who claimed to have ruled over Ur. The first monarch with an Elamite name who became connected with Larsa was Kudur-Mabug, son of Shimti-Shilkhak, the father of Warad-Sin and Rim-Sin.
It was from one of these Elamite monarchs that Sin-muballit captured Isin, and probably the Elamites were also the leaders of the army of Ur which he had routed before that event took place. He was not successful, however, in driving the Elamites from the land, and possibly he arranged with them a treaty of peace or perhaps of alliance.
     Much controversy has been waged over the historical problems connected with this disturbed age. The records are exceedingly scanty, because the kings were not in the habit of commemorating battles which proved disastrous to them, and their fragmentary references to successes are not sufficient to indicate what permanent results accrued from their various campaigns. All we know for certain is that for a considerable period, extending perhaps over a century, a tremendous and disastrous struggle was waged at intervals, which desolated middle Babylonia. At least five great cities were destroyed by fire, as is testified by the evidence accumulated by excavators. These were Lagash, Umma, Shurruppak, Kisurra, and Adab. The ancient metropolis of Lagash, whose glory had been revived by Gudea and his kinsmen, fell soon after the rise of Larsa, and lay in ruins until the second century B.C., when, during the Seleucid Period, it was again occupied for a time. From its mound at Tello, and the buried ruins of the other cities, most of the relics of ancient Sumerian civilization have been recovered.
      It was probably during one of the intervals of this stormy period that the rival kings in Babylonia joined forces against a common enemy and invaded the Western Land. Probably there was much unrest there. Great ethnic disturbances were in progress which were changing the political complexion of Western Asia. In addition to the outpourings of Arabian peoples into Palestine and Syria, which propelled other tribes to invade Mesopotamia, northern Babylonia, and Assyria, there was also much unrest all over the wide area to north and west of Elam. Indeed, the Elamite migration into southern Babylonia may not have been unconnected with the southward drift of roving bands from Media and the Iranian plateau.
      It is believed that these migrations were primarily due to changing climatic conditions, a prolonged "Dry Cycle" having caused a shortage of herbage, with the result that pastoral peoples were compelled to go farther and farther afield in quest of "fresh woods and pastures new". Innumerable currents and cross currents were set in motion once these race movements swept towards settled districts either to flood them with human waves, or surround them like islands in the midst of tempest-lashed seas, fretting the frontiers with restless fury, and ever groping for an inlet through which to flow with irresistible force.
    
     Northern Babylonia and Assyria probably attracted the tillers of the soil. But the movements of seafarers must have followed a different route. It is possible that about this time the Phoenicians began to migrate towards the "Upper Sea". According to their own traditions, their racial cradle was on the northern shore of the Persian Gulf. So far as we know, they first made their appearance on the Mediterranean coast about 2000 B.C., where they subsequently entered into competition as sea traders with the mariners of ancient Crete. Apparently the pastoral nomads pressed northward through Mesopotamia and towards Canaan. As much is suggested by the Biblical narrative which deals with the wanderings of Terah, Abraham, and Lot. Taking with them their "flocks and herds and tents", and accompanied by wives, and families, and servants, they migrated, it is stated, from the Sumerian city of Ur northwards to Haran "and dwelt there". After Terah's death the tribe wandered through Canaan and kept moving southward, unable, it would seem, to settle permanently in any particular district. At length "there was a famine in the land"--an interesting reference to the "Dry Cycle"--and the wanderers found it necessary to take refuge for a time in Egypt. There they appear to have prospered. Indeed, so greatly did their flocks and herds increase that when they returned to Canaan they found that "the land was not able to bear them", although the conditions had improved somewhat during the interval. "There was", as a result, "strife between the herdmen of Abram's cattle and the herdmen of Lot's cattle."

The Complete History of the Nephilim Amorite